Surprising Facts About DC Landlord Tenant Law

Five strange facts about DC landlord tenant court

  1. The Landlord-Tenant Branch of the DC Superior Court has long been considered a bit of an oddity in the DC Court System. Until recently, the court still only accepted paper filings while the Civil Actions Branch had long moved on to e-filings.
  2. The court itself is not in the court’s main building, but in an auxiliary building shared with the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch.
  3. It has its own court rules which either truncate or do away with a significant amount of court rules.
  4. Although it revises some of the court rules to either truncate or do away with entirely a set of standard court procedures, the court has somewhat complicated the process by which to ask for some of these procedures when they could be useful.
  5. Whatever benefit in terms of speed or simplicity that can be surmised by the court rules of the Landlord-Tenant Branch, it is offset (from the perspective of a residential landlord) by the heavy regulation governing housing in the District of Columbia.

Landlords can’t change the locks during eviction

For a landlord faced with the hard decision such as starting their first eviction process, all this information can seem very daunting. Many landlords don’t even know that they cannot resort to self-help. In other words, a landlord cannot forcibly throw a tenant out of the property. Those reading this who already knew that should not pat themselves on the back just yet.

Force is measured by a low legal standard, which means that even a change of locks is considered self-help and could subject you to serious criminal and civil sanction.

Attorney’s fees are prohibited

Some strange features can highlight the seemingly counter-intuitive nature of the Landlord-Tenant matter. People are sometimes mystified at the rarity of attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees, as a matter of right, are prohibited in residential leases. Nevertheless, judges do have the power to order them in limited circumstances.

Landlords can’t obtain a money judgment

Another peculiar feature of the Landlord-Tenant Court is the inability to obtain a money judgment in case the tenant is not personally served. Sometimes tenants will avoid service and it may be easier for a landlord to resort to what is often referred to as “service by attachment.” Service by attachment will allow a landlord to obtain a judgment for possession but not a money judgment.

Tenants can investigate landlords

Sometimes a tenant, in limited circumstances, can open discovery into a plaintiff in Landlord-Tenant Court, which can be less than ideal for the landlord (either the owner or the management company).

Why an attorney is needed for Washington DC landlord-tenant disputes

All this is to say that there can be so many issues that arise in Landlord-Tenant Court that the eviction process is sometimes not given the respect it deserves. Washington, DC has some of the most complex housing laws and eviction procedures in the United States. A landlord, an owner or management company for that matter, would be well served hiring a law firm that understands the complexities of Landlord-Tennant Law in The District of Columbia.

Getting it wrong will cost landlords time and money 

The Landlord-Tenant Court is supposed to move quickly based on the expedited procedures put in place. But if you get the procedures wrong, then the process can take much longer than a landlord would expect. And when you could be renting the property to someone who is not violating the lease, time is money. 

Related Posts

A group of people pointing to a laptop

Startup Law Essentials: Safeguard Your New Business

Launching a startup is an exciting and transformative journey, but beneath the vision, innovation, and hustle lies a critical foundation that many overlook—legal structure and compliance. From forming your business entity to protecting intellectual property and minimizing liability, the legal groundwork you lay early on can mean the difference between success and costly setbacks.

A gavel next to a scale

On-Demand Legal Counsel: Why More Businesses Are Ditching In-House Lawyers

Companies, especially startups, SMEs, and even mature enterprises, are rethinking traditional models of legal support. One of the most significant shifts in this area is the growing adoption of on-demand legal counsel or fractional legal services. Rather than maintaining expensive in-house legal teams, businesses are choosing to engage experienced legal professionals only when needed. This model promises flexibility, affordability, and access to specialized expertise, and it’s gaining traction faster than ever.

Scroll to Top